New: 🧠 Market Minds Issue #135

We appreciate each and every one of you for taking the time to read Market Minds. Buckle up and enjoy the free value, and you won’t want to miss… a $8M private compound that feels more like a luxury resort than a home

The first half of 2026 was expected to test the housing market. Mortgage rates remained high, affordability stayed under pressure, and many expected demand to weaken.

Instead, the market settled into something closer to normal.

Inventory increased from the extremely low levels seen during the pandemic years. Homes took longer to sell. Buyers gained more options, and sellers lost some negotiating power. Even so, demand remained surprisingly steady.

The idea of a single national housing story is becoming less useful.

Some of the strongest markets were not the usual suspects. Cities such as Rochester, Hartford, Cleveland, and Columbus frequently posted tighter inventory and faster sales than several Sun Belt markets that dominated headlines just a few years ago.

Meanwhile, Austin, Phoenix, Tampa, and Dallas slowed.

Enough to remind everyone that regional narratives can become outdated quickly.

Many of the markets that surged during the pandemic continued moving back toward more traditional conditions.

Homes stayed on the market longer. Inventory recovered. Price cuts became more common.

That sounds negative until you remember the benchmark. These markets are slowing relative to an exceptionally hot period, not relative to historical standards.

An unexpected winner emerged: markets that never experienced the biggest boom.

Cities across the Midwest and Northeast generally avoided the sharp price increases, investor speculation, and migration surges seen elsewhere. As rates began to rise, they had fewer excesses to work through.

As a result, some of today's strongest-performing markets are benefiting more from restraint than from recovery.

Markets that looked boring during the boom now look resilient.

The biggest unanswered question is still supply.

Inventory growth has slowed. New listings remain below historical norms. Yet hundreds of thousands of homes remain under contract across the country.

Demand is still present.

What remains less clear is why inventory continues to be constrained. Stronger demand? Fewer homeowners willing to sell? Owners locked into very low mortgage rates with little incentive to move?

Probably some combination of all three.

That makes inventory both the most important variable in housing and one of the most difficult to interpret.

The first half of 2026 did not prove that the housing market is either strong or weak.

It suggested that the market is becoming more local, more fragmented, and harder to summarize through a single narrative.

The idea that higher rates would trigger a broad correction looks less certain today than it did six months ago. But the idea that demand remains strong everywhere doesn't fully fit the data either

A growing number of people considering a move are delaying their decision, hoping the second half of the year will bring lower rates, better conditions, or a better opportunity.

The argument here is that waiting may be solving the wrong problem. Mortgage rates are expected to remain relatively stable, while some of the advantages available today are seasonal and temporary.

For buyers, the biggest challenge lately hasn't been demand. It's been choice.

Summer typically brings a significant increase in new listings, creating more opportunities to find a home that fits both budget and preferences. More inventory doesn't make homes cheaper, but it does make the search less constrained.

Many buyers are waiting for affordability to improve, while the number of available options may be peaking right now. By fall, the market often becomes quieter, though not necessarily cheaper.

For sellers, summer has historically brought a more active pool of buyers.

Families trying to move before the school year begins, workers relocating, and buyers taking advantage of better weather create a sense of urgency that can translate into stronger offers. Homes often sell for slightly more during these months than later in the year.

But the market isn't handing out free money. A seasonal boost is not the same thing as a seller's market. Buyers remain selective, and pricing too aggressively can still backfire.

The entire argument rests on historical seasonal patterns: more inventory for buyers and stronger pricing for sellers.

That may be true. But there's a small contradiction hiding beneath the surface. If summer is simultaneously the best time to buy because more homes are available and the best time to sell because buyers are more motivated, someone still has to be giving something up.

The reality is probably less dramatic than either side suggests. Summer may simply be the period when the market functions most normally.

Waiting is no longer a neutral choice. If inventory declines and buyer activity cools later in the year, some opportunities will disappear while others emerge.

The question is shifting from "Will the market improve?" to "Which version of the market would I rather deal with?"

SpaceX is reportedly valued north of $350B — the biggest pre-IPO story of the decade.

But you don't have to wait for the listing to position yourself.

We've identified 3 publicly-traded companies with direct exposure to SpaceX's growth — names you can buy today in your regular brokerage account.

From the satellite supplier embedded in Starlink's hardware to a defense contractor sitting on a multi-year Falcon 9 deal, these are the tickers Wall Street is quietly accumulating ahead of the listing.

Grab the full breakdown in our free SpaceX IPO Playbook, including target levels, risk tiers, and the one name our analysts think has the most upside.

Get the Free Playbook

The House passed a broad housing package with overwhelming support, 390–9: lawmakers from both parties now agree that housing affordability has become an economic and political problem that can no longer be ignored.

The bill, known as the Housing for the 21st Century Act, combines more than 20 housing-related measures aimed at expanding homeownership and improving affordability.

In a Congress that rarely reaches broad consensus, the margin of the vote is almost as notable as the legislation itself.

The proposal reflects a growing belief that America's housing problem is, at its core, a supply problem.

The argument is straightforward. Fewer homes have been built than demand requires, contributing to higher prices. Much of the legislation focuses on reducing administrative barriers, modernizing existing programs, and making it easier for communities and lenders to support new development.

The conversation appears to be shifting from how to help people afford housing toward how to increase the supply of housing itself.

Many of the provisions focus on studying gaps in federal programs, reviewing inefficiencies, and updating existing systems.

That may sound underwhelming. There is broad agreement that housing has become too expensive. What remains less clear is which policies will meaningfully increase supply and how quickly their effects could be felt.

The legislation contains concrete measures, but also a significant amount of diagnosis. After years of discussing the housing crisis, Congress is still trying to determine where the biggest bottlenecks actually are.

The proposal now moves to the Senate, where lawmakers are already working on their own bipartisan housing plans and are expected to make changes.

That leaves the package in an unusual position: politically strong, but legislatively unfinished.

The broad consensus suggests that housing has become one of the few issues capable of crossing ideological lines. The harder question is whether that consensus survives once specific projects, local regulations, and competing interests enter the conversation.

There appears to be agreement that the United States needs more housing.

Agreement on where to build it, how to build it, and who will bear the costs remains pending.

This $7.99M estate outside Ann Arbor, MI isn't just a home—it's a private resort spread across more than 30 acres. The property includes three separate residences, a massive recreation center with an indoor pool and full sports court, a private ice rink, greenhouse, pavilion, and enough amenities to make a luxury resort seem incomplete. Inspired by Frank Lloyd Wright and tucked away just minutes from downtown Ann Arbor, it's one of the most unusual properties currently on the market.

Check it out👇

Housing is becoming harder to simplify. The market is no longer behaving as one national story, with local conditions increasingly driving different outcomes across the country. At the same time, buyers and sellers waiting for better conditions are discovering that delay comes with its own trade-offs, as opportunities change rather than disappear. In Washington, lawmakers have reached rare agreement that housing affordability is a problem and that supply matters, but consensus on the diagnosis has not yet produced consensus on the solution. The common thread is that the biggest housing debates are shifting away from identifying problems and toward deciding which trade-offs are acceptable. The shortage is widely recognized. What remains unresolved is who is willing to act, where change should happen, and what it will cost.

Have a great weekend - we’ll see you next Saturday.

Cheers 🍻

-Market Minds Team

The content of Market Minds is provided for informational purposes only and reflects personal opinions based on sources believed to be reliable. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Each reader is solely responsible for their own decisions.