In partnership with
We appreciate each and every one of you for taking the time to read Market Minds. Buckle up and enjoy the free value, and you won’t want to miss… why Washington’s housing war on Wall Street is more political theater than market reality
Washington Declares War on Wall Street’s Front Lawn
A Political Shock, Not a Market Earthquake
Trump’s threat to ban large institutional buyers from single-family homes detonated exactly where you’d expect: public markets. Single-family rental REITs sold off fast, hard, and emotionally. That’s Wall Street reacting to a headline, not a balance sheet. The plumbing of this market hasn’t changed. Big investors haven’t been vacuuming homes off the MLS for years but sourcing through builders and purpose-built development. That nuance matters, and it’s why analysts quietly called the selloff “excessive” within hours .
The Optics Are the Policy
“People live in homes, not corporations” is a sentence engineered only for applause. Any real ban would need Congress, exemptions, and carve-outs large enough to drive a Blackstone truck through. Expect new construction to remain sacred. Expect lawyers to feast. Expect the announcement to do more work than the legislation. This is housing as theater.
Builders Feel It Before Landlords Do
If there’s a real near-term casualty, it isn’t rental portfolios. It’s incremental demand for new homes. Institutional buyers account for a thin but meaningful slice of builder absorption. Remove 3–5% of buyers and margins feel it, especially in Sun Belt submarkets built around scale buyers. This doesn’t collapse supply. It quietly reshuffles who gets first call on inventory.
Investors Aren’t the Villain
Investor activity has already cooled. Purchases are flat, losses are rising, and easy money flipped into hard math. The more uncomfortable truth is that affordability is a supply problem wrapped in an interest-rate problem, wearing an investor costume. Going after institutions is politically efficient because it avoids confronting zoning boards, local veto power, and the fact that America underbuilt for a decade.
Small Capital Is the Silent Winner
Here’s the part no one is shouting: mega-investors are a rounding error. Small operators account for multiples of institutional activity. If regulatory risk scares off scale capital while leaving mom-and-pop untouched, competition thins where it already has. Fewer bidders, less froth, more patience. That’s not a crash. That’s a reset in who sets the marginal price.
The Takeaway You Should Sit With
This proposal isn’t about banning capital from housing but about signaling who’s welcome. Markets hear noise; politics hears votes. The gap between the two is where opportunity hides. Watch the builders, not the tweets. Watch exemptions, not slogans. And remember: when housing becomes a culture war, the smartest money stops arguing and starts underwriting the second-order effects.
FHA Report Isn’t Ringing the Alarm but Rewriting the Risk Map
The Capital Cushion Is Real And It Changes the Conversation
The FHA enters 2026 with an 11.47% capital ratio, nearly six times the statutory minimum and tied for the strongest position in its history. That number matters less as a headline and more as a signal. This is not an institution bracing for impact. It’s one that has spent more than a decade rebuilding credibility, discipline, and optionality after learning, painfully, what happens when leverage meets optimism. With $188.9B in economic net worth backing $1.6T in insured mortgages, FHA isn’t guessing. It’s absorbing volatility with intent.
Affordability Is the Stress, Not Credit
If you’re waiting for credit to crack, you’re watching the wrong fault line. Average FHA borrower credit scores climbed to 679, the highest level in over a decade, and have risen four years in a row. That’s not late-cycle decay, that’s underwriting getting sharper while prices and payments do the damage. This market isn’t buckling under recklessness. It’s grinding under cost. That distinction matters because affordability pressure slows behavior; credit pressure breaks systems.
First-Time Buyers Are Still the Market’s Spine
More than 83% of FHA purchase loans went to first-time buyers. Not aspirational buyers. Actual ones. FHA didn’t drift from its mission and doubled down on it as private capital pulled back. Market share rose to roughly 19%, not because FHA loosened standards, but because it remained willing to show up when others went quiet. That’s what countercyclical looks like in practice.
Risk Isn’t Gone, It’s Concentrated
The sharpest warning in the report isn’t about volume or defaults. It’s about layering. Loans combining low credit scores, high debt ratios, and minimal equity now make up 8.4% of new endorsements, and they fail early at multiples of the rest of the book. FHA isn’t pretending otherwise. It rebuilt its risk lens to isolate where losses actually come from, instead of smearing fear across the entire portfolio. That’s a subtle but profound upgrade from pre-2008 thinking.
The Real Downside Requires a Very Specific Collapse
FHA stress tests show that only deep, sustained national price declines 25% or more, produce serious capital damage. And history is blunt here: outside of the 2007–2011 collapse, that kind of outcome requires a perfect storm of credit failure and forced selling. Today’s borrowers don’t resemble that era, and neither does today’s lending stack. Price stagnation hurts activity. It doesn’t detonate balance sheets.
Why This Market Feels Worse Than It Is
The disconnect between sentiment and data comes from friction. High prices, high rates, and delayed gratification create emotional drag, even when fundamentals are intact. FHA’s numbers describe a system adapting to constraint, not unraveling from excess. The risk has shifted from who gets approved to what homes cost and how long buyers are willing to wait.
The Quiet Signal Heading Into 2026
When the backstop is strong, disciplined, and growing more precise about risk, the market recalibrates. FHA isn’t promising relief. It’s promising resilience. And that’s the difference between a slowdown you work through and a crisis you survive.
Taken together, this report doesn’t whisper “2008.” It says something less dramatic and more actionable: the system is tighter, smarter, and slower and that’s exactly why it’s holding.
A brief sponsor break
Pelosi Made 178% While Your 401(k) Crashed
Nancy Pelosi: Up 178% on TEM options
Marjorie Taylor Greene: Up 134% on PLTR
Cleo Fields: Up 138% on IREN
Meanwhile, retail investors got crushed on CNBC's "expert" picks.
The uncomfortable truth: Politicians don't just make laws. They make fortunes.
AltIndex reports every single Congress filing without fail and updates their data constantly.
Then their AI factors those Congress trades into the AI stock ratings on the AltIndex app.
We’ve partnered with AltIndex to get our readers free access to their app for a limited time.
Congress filed 7,810 new stock buys this year as of July.
Don’t miss out on direct access to their playbooks!
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk including possible loss of principal.
Included because it may be relevant to how some people track markets.
Congress trade disclosures are public. Some platforms aggregate them.
The Hottest Housing Markets Aren’t Where You Think, This week we focus on: West New York
Scarcity Is the Asset, Not the ZIP Code
Irondequoit, New York beating Sunnyvale, California feels counterintuitive until you stop confusing price with pressure. This isn’t about glamour markets. It’s about velocity. Homes moving in 8–10 days, selling 10–20% over ask, with less than a month of supply. That’s not a housing market, that’s a clearance aisle with a velvet rope. Capital doesn’t chase views anymore, it chases certainty. And certainty right now is defined by scarcity so extreme it borders on dysfunction.
The Rust Belt was only Mispriced
Western New York didn’t suddenly get sexy. It got cheap enough to matter when money stopped being free. When mortgage rates snapped above 6%, buyers didn’t disappear, they recalibrated. They went where incomes could still clear monthly payments without financial self-harm. What you’re watching in Rochester and Buffalo isn’t a renaissance, it’s price discovery catching up after decades of neglect. The market didn’t fall in love with these places. It simply ran out of alternatives.
The Bay Area’s Second Act Is Fueled by AI, Not Optimism
The Bay Area’s return isn’t a lifestyle story, it’s a balance sheet story. Tech compensation rebounded, bonuses reappeared, and prices stalled just long enough for buyers with stock-based incomes to feel clever again. This is what happens when constrained supply collides with a narrow but extremely solvent buyer pool. It's in sharp demand. And sharp demand moves markets faster than mass appeal ever did.
Sun Belt Hangovers Are What Overbuilding Looks Like
Texas and Florida did the thing policymakers always say they want: they built housing. A lot of it. And now they’re being punished for it. Inventory is up double digits, days on market are stretching, and sellers are learning the emotional difference between “list price” and “market price.” Climate risk and insurance chaos didn’t help, but the real issue is simple: supply showed up. When supply shows up, leverage leaves.
This Is a Story of Supply Failure
Buffalo built 74 single-family homes in a month. Austin built 3,465. That one stat explains half the table. Markets don’t become competitive because everyone suddenly wants in. They become competitive because nothing new comes online. New York and California didn’t engineer demand but constraints. And constraints are inflationary by design.
Prices Rising in a Weak Market Is the Tell
Competition is historically low nationwide, yet prices are still hitting highs. That’s the tell. This market is broken in a very specific way: liquidity is thin, sellers are frozen, and the marginal buyer sets the price. When only the most motivated (or capitalized) participants remain, averages lie and extremes dominate. You’re not in a boom. You’re in a bottleneck.
2026 Won’t Fix This but Will Clarify It
Rates drifting into the low 6s won’t save affordability. They’ll simply invite a few more bidders into the same undersupplied rooms. Great Lakes cities stay hot, the Sun Belt stays slow, and the middle remains tense. Normal doesn’t return because nothing structural has changed. Housing isn’t cyclical right now. It’s constrained. And constrained markets don’t cool, they ration.
If you’re feeling whiplash, good. That’s the market telling you the old mental models are obsolete. This isn’t about where people want to live. It’s about where they’re allowed to buy.
Isn’t it gorgeous? And competitive!
This Rochester, NY mid-century ranch is listed at $750,000, and yes… it’s gorgeous. Six beds, six baths, nearly 3,500 sqft, park views, Lake Ontario beach access, and a resort-style pool, all sitting quietly next to Durand Eastman Park. The real question isn’t why it’s beautiful… it’s how competitive this one is about to get.
Check it out👇
Another brief sponsor break
Wall Street Isn’t Warning You, But This Chart Might
Vanguard just projected public markets may return only 5% annually over the next decade. In a 2024 report, Goldman Sachs forecasted the S&P 500 may return just 3% annually for the same time frame—stats that put current valuations in the 7th percentile of history.
Translation? The gains we’ve seen over the past few years might not continue for quite a while.
Meanwhile, another asset class—almost entirely uncorrelated to the S&P 500 historically—has overall outpaced it for decades (1995-2024), according to Masterworks data.
Masterworks lets everyday investors invest in shares of multimillion-dollar artworks by legends like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso.
And they’re not just buying. They’re exiting—with net annualized returns like 17.6%, 17.8%, and 21.5% among their 23 sales.*
Wall Street won’t talk about this. But the wealthy already are. Shares in new offerings can sell quickly but…
*Past performance is not indicative of future returns. Important Reg A disclosures: masterworks.com/cd.
Included because it reflects how some investors are thinking about diversification.
Some forecasts point to lower public market returns. Others look at uncorrelated assets.
The Power Move
Power isn’t loud; it’s built quietly while others pull back.
FHA entered 2026 with an 11.47% capital ratio, nearly six times the statutory minimum, after years of tightening underwriting and rebuilding its balance sheet.
That restraint let it expand market share to roughly 19% by showing up for first-time buyers when private capital retreated, absorbing volatility instead of amplifying it.
Resilience beats reassurance.
TL;DR (Too Long; Didn’t Read)
This isn’t a housing crash, it’s a political rerouting of blame inside a system that refuses to fix supply. Washington yells at Wall Street because zoning boards don’t vote, FHA quietly proves the financial plumbing is sturdier than the vibes suggest, and the hottest markets aren’t “hot”, they’re starved. Institutional buyers are the headline villain but a footnote in the data; small landlords and scarcity do the real price-setting. Affordability isn’t breaking because credit is loose, it’s breaking because nothing gets built where people want to live, and rates turned patience into a luxury good. The market isn’t overheated, it’s constricted. When housing becomes culture war content, ignore the noise, watch who still has capital, and remember: scarcity always wins, it just changes uniforms.
Have a great weekend - we’ll see you next Saturday.
Cheers 🍻
-Market Minds Team
The content of Market Minds is provided for informational purposes only and reflects personal opinions based on sources believed to be reliable. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Each reader is solely responsible for their own decisions.